PeerPoint Ad 

 

You are here: Home Resources Medical Review Blog Clinical trial rule ignored
Document Actions

Clinical trial rule ignored

A new study in The Journal of the American Medical Association shows that many researchers are ignoring a 2005 requirement that forces them to register proposed clinical trials in a government database as a condition for publishing their results in medical journals.

The New York Times reported on the issue:

The study is a review of 323 articles published last year in leading medical journals. Researchers found that only 147 of the clinical trials, just 45.5 percent, "were properly registered before the end of the trial in a way that clearly stated the main outcomes being assessed. Even among the articles that were registered, almost a third had discrepancies between the outcomes described in the registry and the ones ultimately reported."

"We're asking people to tell readers honestly and transparently, 'What did you do, and what did you find?" said an author of the paper, David Moher, senior scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute in Canada, in the New York Times.

To read the full article and to link to the original study, click here: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/08/health/08aware.html?ref=health


Rating
Average Rating:
2.9 (298 Votes )
Rated objects
Recent Comments
Weblog Authors

Amie Dahnke

Amie Dahnke

Andrew Rowe

Andrew Rowe

Sean Wolverton

Location: Portland, OR
Sean Wolverton
I've been AllMed's Marketing Communications Specialist since May of 2007. My main duties are the updating and moderating the website, and creating the monthly newsletters called PeerPoints. Outside of work I enjoy playing golf on the weekends, snowboarding, and exploring Portland.