Document Actions
While the US Spends Heavily on Healthcare, a Study Faults the Quality
Usually paying a premium for services and goods means you’re getting a
product of higher quality in return. For example, organic produce costs
more than conventionally-grown produce and octane 92 gas costs more
than octane 89 but you get what you pay for: better fruits and cleaner
gasoline.
According to a study conducted by Commonwealth Fund, a
nonprofit research group in New York, this get-what-you-pay-for formula
is not the case for the American healthcare system. The report shows
that the United States spends more than twice as much on each person
for health care as most other industrialized countries but has fallen
to last place among those countries in preventing deaths through use of
timely and effective medical care.
In summary: Americans are
paying way too much for very little. The study also examines costs and
inefficiencies within the American healthcare system. The
administrative costs of the medical insurance systems consume much more
of the current healthcare dollar, about 7.5 percent, than in other
countries.
One avenue that healthcare payors can take to reduce
costs is to outsource review cases to independent review organizations
(IRO). IROs are efficient, cost-effective and knowledgeable, providing
peer specialists who are actively practicing and up-to-date with
today’s medical standards. By ensuring that reviews are done according
to current medical standards, IROs reduce extraneous administrative
costs of rework and re-reviewing.


